Legal Woes for the Easter Bunny
Several years ago, our young daughter asked a very direct question: “Is Santa Clause real?”
Despite my attempts to fend them off, the questions continued. As did the lack of clear responses.
A few months later, she had another direct question: “Mom, is the Easter Bunny real?”
These questions have caused many a parent to pause.
What is a parent to do, a parent who believes both in the wonder of childhood, and in honesty within families?
It had not occurred to me that anyone would try to compel me to provide a particular response.
But that is exactly what happened to some foster parents in Ontario a few years ago.
A couple, Frances and Derek Baars, applied to become foster parents. They also hoped to adopt one day. They were devout Christians.
During the application process, they disclosed that based on their religious beliefs, they did not celebrate Halloween or promote Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny. They stated that they did not want to lie to children.
In December, 2015, two sisters were placed with the Baars as foster parents. The intention was that they would some day return to their biological parents.
The birth mother wanted the children to experience the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.
Within days, an issue arose because the Baars would not promote Santa Claus. Mrs. Baars told a children’s aid worker that Santa does not come to her house. The worker then advised the children that Santa would be delivering presents to their mother’s home.
Then, a few months later, a children’s aid worker insisted that the Baars inform the girls that the Easter Bunny was “a real entity.”
They refused to either tell or imply that the Easter Bunny was delivering chocolate to their home.
The Baars believed that “truth-telling in every area of life is important…. It was crucial that we knew we were telling the children the truth and they had the right to expect us to tell the truth.”
They intended to hide chocolate eggs for the girls, and play other games. They did not plan to speak to the children about the Easter Bunny, unless the girls specifically asked.
For this reason, the Aid Society closed their foster home. The two girls, aged three and five, were taken away, their lives disrupted once again.
The Baars moved West, and commenced a legal challenge against the Children’s Aid Society of Hamilton.
They sought not money, but vindication. Specifically, they sought a declaration that the Society violated their freedom of conscience and religion, freedom of expression, and the right to be free from discrimination under sections 2(a), 2(b), and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They also sought a declaration that closing their foster home was unreasonable, discriminatory and contrary to and violated their Charter rights.
In a 62 page judgment, the court agreed. It found that the Society violated the Baars’ fundamental rights to freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.
The evidence was that the Baars did “attempt to preserve the children’s enjoyment of the holidays, even if they were not able, pursuant to their religious beliefs, to positively perpetuate the existence of … characters that are associated with those holidays.”
The court found that the Society had created in bad faith and for an improper purpose a requirement to actively or proactively inform the children that the Easter bunny is real.
It said the Society’s actions were “capricious,” “not in the children’s best interests,” and potentially revealed an “underlying animus” by the Society and its workers.
The agency’s decision to remove the children prevented the couple from fostering other children and likely interfered with their plans to adopt.
The couple hoped that the decision would assist their adoption process to go more smoothly.
No doubt they were glad that they had fought for their rights, and held to account those who had wronged them.
This is a modified version of an article that appeared in the Kelowna Daily Courier on April 19, 2019, the Kelowna Capital News on April 21, 2019 and other online publications. The content of this article is intended to provide very general thoughts and general information, not to provide legal advice. Advice from an experienced legal professional should be sought about your specific circumstances. If you would like to reach us, we may be reached at 250-764-7710 or email@example.com.